News Listing
 

Questions on stimulus funding? Here's where you can get information.

The Office of Proposal Development will monitor information related the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA), otherwise known as the Stimulus Package. Check back often for updates to this page.

How can I find funding opportunities associated with the stimulus funds?

Information on grants and cooperative agreements can be found on the Grants.gov website (www.grants.gov). Under the “What’s New This Week at Grants.gov” header you will find a link to “Recovery Act Opportunities on Grants.gov.” There you will find a summary of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) legislation and a link to the Recovery.gov website. There is a radio button that takes you to a list of Recovery Act funding opportunities, sorted by deadline. You will also find a link to each federal agency’s Recovery website.

Information on contract opportunities can be found at FedBizOpps (https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=main&mode=list&tab=list): on the right-hand frame, click on “Search Recovery Opportunities.”

UNC General Administration Recovery Website

This site includes information related to Recovery funding for higher education in North Carolina. It has links to Governor Purdue’s Office of Economic Recovery and Investment and Senator Kay Hagan’s guidebook for information on how to take advantage of Recovery funding. See “Research FAQs” for a collection of FAQs on what the Recovery funding means for Research Administration in North Carolina. http://frc.northcarolina.edu/recovery.htm

UNC GA Sponsored Programs and Research Council (SPARC) Weekly ARRA Updates

5-22-09

5-15-09

5-7-09

4-24-09

4-3-09

3-27-09

3-20-09

ARRA Report Template

Links to other university Recovery sites

UNC Chapel Hill (updated daily) http://research.unc.edu/recovery/

NC State http://www.ncsu.edu/stimulus/


Community of Science offers online user training.

The Community of Science (COS) offers free online training sessions for end users, including faculty, staff and graduate students, who want to learn to use COS resources, including its Funding Opportunities and expertise databases. COS is the most comprehensive source of funding information available on the Web, including more than 400,000 funding opportunities.

Information on individual sessions and enrollment is available on the COS website at http://www.cos.com/usertraining/. In addition, webinar recordings of product demos and training sessions are available for those who can not attend the user training sessions.

For more information or assistance with your COS account, contact UNC Charlotte’s COS liaison Susan Robinson at ext.7-2022 or ssrobins@uncc.edu.


NSF FastLane currently not supporting Microsoft Office 2007 file types.

For PIs using Microsoft Office 2007, NSF offers two options for uploading .docx files.

See FastLane's "Help for Proposal Functions" at https://www.fastlane-beta.nsf.gov/NSFHelp/flashhelp/fastlane/FastLane_Help/fastlane_help.htm#fastlane_help_for_proposal_functions.htm for more information.


Here are some tips for using NORM.

In December 2008, UNC Charlotte transitioned to RAMSeS (Research Administration Management System & eSubmission) now known as NORM (Niner On-line Research Management), a comprehensive research proposal and award management system from pre-award to post-award with electronic signatures. NORM, which also serves as a data repository with comprehensive reporting, is accessible from the Research and Federal Relations website, and http://www.research.uncc.edu/. Any UNC Charlotte faculty or staff member can log into NORM using their user name and password.

ORS no longer accepts paper Internal Processing Forms (IPFs). Proposals must be submitted to ORS through NORM, which allows the office to retain an electronic copy of all documents associated with proposals and awards. This also allows the principal investigator (PI) to post drafts of the proposal and budget for review by the college-based research offices or ORS in advance.

The IPFs are now routed and approved electronically. The lead PI or departmental administrator should complete the Start New Proposal screen. Once completed, the system will automatically generate a proposal number. Faculty should complete this information in NORM as soon as possible and at least two weeks prior to the submission deadline. The earlier this is done, the better prepared the college-based research offices or ORS will be to assist the faculty. Proposal files consisting of the proposal narrative, budget, budget justification, letters of support and other documents can be uploaded in the Attachments section within the system. Departmental, college and center/institute approvals will be routed electronically. Once approved, either the college-based research office or ORS will approve and submit the final proposal.

Below are some tips for completing e-IPFs in NORM:

General Information Screen:

Funding Agency (required field) vs. Prime Funding Agency (required only if UNC Charlotte is a subcontractor on another institution’s proposal). The funding agency is the agency or sponsor whose name will be on the check to UNC Charlotte or to whom the Office of Sponsored Programs will send invoices. The prime funding agency applies when UNC Charlotte receives a subgrant or subcontract from an intermediate funding source. (e.g., NIH awards a grant to Duke and Duke awards a subgrant to UNC Charlotte. NIH is the prime funding agency, and Duke is the funding agency.) Leave this field blank if UNC Charlotte is not a subcontractor on another institution’s proposal.

Award Admin Dept. The award admin department is the department that will manage the grant if awarded; it should be the lead PI’s department. Entering the department in this field makes it the first department that must approve the proposal. NOTE: Do not enter the college in this field because the college will be set up as the first approver and colleges should always approve after departments and centers.

Affiliated Center/Institute. Select the UNC Charlotte centers/institutes that will contribute space, personnel, equipment or cost-sharing to this project. You can select as many centers/institutes as necessary. Be sure to add the center(s)/institute(s) before you submit the e-IPF so the unit(s) will be set up to approve the e-IPF.

Sponsor Deadline. If there is an actual deadline, enter that date. If there is no hard deadline, enter a date and add a submission note on the final e-IPF screen indicating that the deadline is not firm but that you want the proposal submitted as soon as possible.

Investigators/Research Team Screen:

NORM terminology here is somewhat different from that traditionally used at UNC Charlotte. In NORM, the Lead Principal Investigator is the person we usually call the PI, and this person has to certify in NORM. The Principal Investigator is the person we usually call the Co-PI, and this person has to certify in NORM. The Investigator is a team member who does not have PI/Co-PI status; he/she does not have to certify in NORM.

The first team member assigned to the project is always the Lead PI; other team members should be added afterward.

A Lead PI or PI on any project who also serves as an e-IPF approver for a department, center, or college should not approve his/her own proposals in NORM. The alternate should approve. If no alternate is listed for a unit, Ellen Zavala can temporarily add an e-IPF approver if requested to do so before the e-IPF is submitted. Plan ahead and notify her (extension 7-2592 or eezavala@uncc.edu) as soon as possible.

% Effort. This field indicates the budgeted percentage of effort for the project period. If the percentage of effort is different in the academic year than the summer, enter a ballpark percentage of effort and include an explanation in the Submission Notes section.

Attachments Screen:

You must attach your proposal narrative (a draft is acceptable) and budget files before submitting your e-IPF. If you do not, you risk having your chair or dean reject the e-IPF in NORM and sending it back to you for resubmission. If that happens, anyone who previously approved the e-IPF will have to re-approve it.

Approving Depts Screen:

Pay close attention to the list of approving departments and make sure all are listed that need to be listed. You may have to add some departments. For example, if a department is providing cost sharing and no one from that department is on the research team, you will have to manually add that department.

1st Approving Department should be the Lead PI’s department. If that is not the case, you will have to change the Award Admin Dept on the first screen.

Each department, center, and college will have a drop down list of numbers beginning with a “2” and going up to the number of units listed. At this point, you can set the routing as sequential or concurrent. When you determine this order, you should ensure departments/centers are to be approved before it goes to any of the deans. This is especially important when you need approvals quickly. Once satisfied with the order, click on the Authorize Approval Listing button.

Submission Notes Screen:

This space allows you to insert special notes that you want to be sure your chairs and deans see. Use this feature as much as you need to.

Submit Proposal Button:

When all screens are completed and you are sure there will be no changes, Submit your e-IPF/proposal.

Certify e-IPF/Proposal:

All Lead PIs and PIs will receive an email indicating that they need to log in and certify the e-IPF/proposal. You must do this before the admin office will submit your proposal.

If you have any questions about NORM, you may contact Bonnie Morton at bmorton7@uncc.edu, or Ellen Zavala at eezavala@uncc.edu.


Revised NSF Proposal and Award Policies and Procedures Guide now in use.

NSF has published a revised version of the NSF Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures Guide (PAPPG), NSF 09-1, that is now effective for all proposals.

Significant changes include: •

  • Entirely new guidance that addresses and implements the mentoring requirement of the America COMPETES Act; •
  • A major revision of NSF’s faculty salary reimbursement policy, to limit compensation for senior personnel to no more than two months of their regular salary in any one year from all NSF-funded grants; •
  • Debut of the Grants for Rapid Response Research (RAPID) and EArly-concept Grants for Exploratory Research (EAGER) mechanisms, that replace the SGER program; and •
  • Revision of the definition of co-PI for greater consistency with guidance issued by OSTP.

    NSF plans to revise existing funding opportunities with due dates before March 31, 2009 to alert proposers that significant changes have been made to NSF proposal preparation guidelines.

    If you have any questions regarding these changes, please contact the Policy Office on 703.292.8243 or by e-mail to policy@nsf.gov.


  • NIH announces change in policy on resubmission (amended) applications

    See . http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/amendedapps.htm

    Beginning with original new applications (i.e., never submitted) and competing renewal applications submitted for the January 25, 2009 due dates and beyond, the NIH will accept only a single amendment to the original application. Failure to receive funding after two submissions (i.e., the original and the single amendment) will mean that the applicant should substantially re-design the project rather than simply change the application in response to previous reviews. It is expected that this policy will lead to funding high quality applications earlier, with fewer resubmissions.

    Background

    Following the release of the Peer Review Report that was drafted with extensive consultation with the external community, Dr. Zerhouni, NIH Director, established a Peer Review Oversight Committee (PROC) to finalize the recommendations and begin immediate implementation of those recommendations. Of particular concern was the marked reduction in the number of awards made in response to original applications. An increasing number of projects were funded only after one or more resubmissions. In periods of constricted funding, a greater number of projects require resubmission, and review committees are more likely to show greater preference for amended applications. These trends have increased the time from original submission to award and the number of submissions per investigator. As a result, there has been greater burden placed on applicants and reviewers as well as a delay in funding for meritorious science.

    To change this trend and increase the likelihood that meritorious original applications will be funded, the NIH will decrease the number of amendments allowed. Accordingly, the NIH will begin to phase out second amendment applications starting with the January 25, 2009 due date. This policy will increase the numbers of high quality original and first amendments that can be funded earlier.

    NIH Policy on Resubmission (Amended) Applications

    Beginning with applications intended for the January 25, 2009 due date, all original new applications (i.e., never submitted) and competing renewal applications will be permitted only a single amendment (A1). For this and subsequent cohorts of original new and competing renewal applications, any second amendment (A2) will be administratively withdrawn and not accepted for review. Applicants who fail to receive funding after two submissions may resubmit but only if the application is fundamentally revised to qualify as new. A new application is expected to be substantially different in content and scope with more significant differences than are normally encountered in an amended application. Note that there is no time limit for the submission of the original and subsequent A1.

    Original new and competing renewal applications that were submitted prior to January 25, 2009 will be permitted two amendments (A1 and A2). For these "grandfathered" applications, NIH expects that any A2 will be submitted no later than January 7, 2011, and NIH will not accept A2 applications after that date.

    This policy applies to all applications, including applications submitted under the NIH Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) programs, Career Development Awards, Individual Fellowships, Institutional Training Grants, Resource Grants, Program Projects, and Centers. Currently no amendments are permitted for applications received in response to a Request for Applications (RFA) unless it is specified in the Funding Opportunity Announcement, in which case only one amendment will be permitted. Inquiries

    Applicants are strongly encouraged to discuss their questions with their NIH IC contact. For additional information or questions, please contact: Division of Receipt and Referral Center for Scientific Review 6701 Rockledge Drive MSC 7720 Bethesda, MD 20892-7720 Voice: (301) 435-0715 Fax: (301) 480-1987


    UNC Charlotte is a partner in the Triangle Census Research Data Center.

    UNC Charlotte is a member of the Triangle Census Research Data Center (TCRDC), a partnership between Duke University, the U.S. Census Bureau and the UNC system. The TCRDC partnership offers faculty, students and research staff access to unpublished micro data from the Bureau’s economic and demographic censuses and surveys via a secured computer laboratory located on the Duke campus. Confidential data from other government agencies may be accessed via the TCRDC as well. A fact sheet on the TCRDC partnership is available at http://www.research.uncc.edu/Prop/TCRDC_FactSheet.docx.

    Researchers wishing to use the TCRDC must submit a proposal to the U.S. Census Bureau for approval. Interested researchers should contact the TCRDC administrator or director about their projects for help in navigating the process and answering questions. For more information on the U.S. Census Bureau Center for Economic Statistics proposal process, see http://www.ces.census.gov/index.php/ces/researchguidelines.


    NIH now requires articles to be submitted to its PubMed Central archive.

    The National Institutes of Health now has a new reporting requirement for all researchers receiving NIH funds. The final, peer-reviewed manuscripts of all articles resulting from NIH-funded research that are accepted for publication on or after April 7 must be submitted to PubMed Central, NIH's digital archive of biomedical and life sciences journal literature. These changes to the NIH Public Access Policy will ensure that the public has access to the published results of all NIH-funded research.

    The policy applies to all peer-reviewed articles that are based on work directly funded by:

  • A NIH grant or cooperative agreement active in Fiscal Year 2008 (Oct. 1, 2007-Sept. 30, 2008) or beyond;
  • A contract signed on or after April 7, 2008;
  • The NIH Intramural Program; or if your salary is paid by the NIH.

    The NIH's Public Access FAQ states that non-compliance will not be a factor in the evaluation of applications, but it "will be addressed administratively, and may delay or prevent awarding of funds."

    Complying with the new policy

    Full compliance to the new policy, which applies to funding received directly from NIH as well as NIH-funding received through a subaward from another institution or entity, includes the following three steps:

    1. Addressing copyright. You must ensure that any copyright transfer or other publication agreements allow your article to be submitted to NIH in accordance with the policy. If your publisher's current agreement transfers copyright to the publisher but does not specifically allow submission to PubMed Central or similar depositories, then you will not retain that right. In these cases, the NIH gives the following as an example of the type of language you could add to the contract: Journal acknowledges that Author retains the right to provide a copy of the final manuscript to the NIH upon acceptance for Journal publication, for public archiving in PubMed Central as soon as possible but no later than 12 months after publication by Journal.
    2. Submitting an article. You may submit your article to be published by the journal of your choice. If you submit to any of these journals, the publisher will deposit the article with NIH for you. You may still have to provide the award information, and review and approve the article, but with that you are considered compliant with the policy's submission requirements. For journals that do not submit your article for you (those not included in the above list), you are responsible for submitting your final, peer-reviewed manuscript upon acceptance for publication to the NIH PubMed Central system. To submit an article, you must log in to the NIH Manuscript Submission System, where you will need your grant number(s); author names; a copy of the final, peer-reviewed manuscript; along with any figures, tables, or data that were submitted to the publisher. NIH provides more information on the submission process and tutorials to guide you, or you may contact Ellen Zavala in the Office of Research Services at eezavala@uncc.edu or ext. 7-2592 for assistance.
    3. Citing an article. Beginning May 25, 2008, when you submit an application, proposal or progress report to the NIH, you must include the PubMed Central reference number (PMCID) or the NIH Manuscript Submission reference number (NIHMS ID) when you cite articles that stem from any NIH-funded research. For the citation, list the PMCID at the end of the full journal citation for the article. If a PMCID is not yet available, include the NIHMS ID instead.

    Want to know more?

  • NIH Public Access – NIH web site on this policy; it includes an FAQ and other useful information.
  • Guide for Research Universities – information on the NIH change from the Association of Research Libraries.
  • Sample cover letter – for use when submitting an article to a journal. Letter is found in Appendix A (page 21).


  • New online IACUC application process introduced.

    On Jan. 15, 2008, the Compliance Office introduced a new online application system for protocols submitted for review by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC). From this point forward, all IACUC applications must be submitted online via the Animal Care Application (ACAP). In addition to streamlining the application process for the investigator, the new ACAP system has been designed to capture all information needed for comprehensive IACUC review and compliance concerns.

    The old downloadable Microsoft Word template previously used for protocol submission will no longer be accepted by the Compliance Office or the IACUC for review and approval. All new protocols must be submitted via the new system. Investigators who originally submitted protocols using this paper form must continue to use the paper forms available on this website for amendments and continuing review/annual renewal submissions until the end of the protocol approval period.

    For more information, call the Compliance Office at 7-2557 with any feedback and/or for help getting started.


    Want to know more about the NC Consortium for Human Subjects Protection?

    The North Carolina Consortium for Human Subjects Protection (NCCHSP) was established Sept. 16, 2004 with funding from the National Institutes of Health to The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

    The purpose of the original Consortium was to promote best practices in human research subject protection across the entire state.

    More information is available at http://www.research.uncc.edu/comp/consortium.cfm .


    UNC Charlotte
    9201 University City Blvd.
    Charlotte, NC 28223-0001
    Phone: 704-687-2291
    Fax: 704-687-2292
    research@uncc.edu